<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechDozor &#187; inktank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/tag/inktank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.techdozor.org</link>
	<description>On top of latest technology trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 02:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SAN vs OpenSource</title>
		<link>http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/09/30/san-vs-opensource/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=san-vs-opensource</link>
		<comments>http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/09/30/san-vs-opensource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cepega</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inktank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scale-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scale-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software-defined-storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.techdozor.org/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog post I would like to discuss SAN (scale-up) vs Scale-out storage but better yet, SAN (proprietary) vs Open Source option available, and why should you care? Am I saying that SAN is all closed source? Yes, that’s &#8230; <a href="http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/09/30/san-vs-opensource/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/09/30/san-vs-opensource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ceph vs Gluster Debate</title>
		<link>http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/06/11/ceph-vs-gluster-debate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ceph-vs-gluster-debate</link>
		<comments>http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/06/11/ceph-vs-gluster-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cepega</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glusterfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glusterinc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inktank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.techdozor.org/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently ran into a very interesting video captured during the LinuxConf in Australia. This video captures the debate between John Mark Walker representing GlusterFS and Sage Weil representing Ceph. Both also represent private entetires Gluster -&#62; Gluster Inc. that now owned by &#8230; <a href="http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/06/11/ceph-vs-gluster-debate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.techdozor.org/index.php/2013/06/11/ceph-vs-gluster-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
